%20(1).png)
Trump newly announced “Gold Card” Program has attracted worldwide attention for promising a fast-track to U.S. permanent residence — in exchange for a large “gift” to the U.S. Treasury. According to the official TrumpCard.gov website, individuals who make a $1 million personal contribution — or $2 million through a corporate sponsor — may qualify for U.S. lawful permanent residence.
However, despite the high-profile rollout, the program’s legal foundation and practical implementation remain uncertain.
While the executive order provides broad direction, it does not create a new immigration category or override existing law. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), only Congress has the power to establish new visa classifications or create pathways to lawful permanent residence. In other words, a presidential executive order cannot independently create a Green Card category.
The Gold Card program appears to rely entirely on executive discretion, without a defined legal foundation within the INA. Until Congress or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) enacts implementing legislation, the program remains a policy proposal without binding legal effect.
This lack of legal grounding means that even if an application process opens, it could face court challenges, regulatory delays, or even suspension if found to conflict with existing immigration law.
Further complicating matters, the sharp reduction in the minimum contribution—from $5 million to $1 million—without any accompanying economic or legislative explanation has raised additional questions about the program’s consistency and long-term viability.
The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, enacted by Congress, allows foreign nationals to obtain permanent residence by investing in U.S. businesses that create at least 10 full-time jobs for American workers.
By contrast, the Gold Card Visa:
Because EB-5 is grounded in statutory law and supported by established regulations, it remains the only legally recognized investor-based route to permanent residence in the United States.
The “Platinum Card” option concept has promised territorial tax treatment — meaning holders would only pay U.S. tax on U.S.-source income. However, under current law, all U.S. citizens and permanent residents are taxed on their worldwide income.
Creating a new tax classification would require Congressional approval to amend the Internal Revenue Code, which an executive order cannot do.
Anyone considering the “Platinum Card” should consult with a qualified international tax attorney to fully understand the financial implications and risks before taking any action.
If you are interested in the Gold Card, Platinum Card or any investor-based immigration option:
The Gold Card Visa program is being promoted as an innovative path to U.S. residency, but for now, it remains a policy proposal rather than an established immigration program. The significant reduction in the required contribution—from $5 million to $1 million—has prompted questions about the program’s structure and long-term implementation. Until the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State issue formal regulations and application procedures, the program cannot yet be considered operational.
At the Law Offices of Sabrina Li, we help clients navigate complex investor and business immigration options backed by solid legal authority. If you are interested in U.S. residency through investment or entrepreneurship, our team can help you identify reliable, lawfully established pathways that protect your time and financial resources.